<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Glic I.T. &#187; WordPress</title> <atom:link href="http://www.glicit.com/category/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.glicit.com</link> <description>Internet and general IT development, consultancy and training</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:08:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <item><title>Moving WordPress</title><link>http://www.glicit.com/2010/04/moving-wordpress/</link> <comments>http://www.glicit.com/2010/04/moving-wordpress/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:11:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.glicit.com/?p=578</guid> <description><![CDATA[Moving your blog (or CMS website) can often be a pain. Believe me, I know. Over the years, I have moved my personal blog from Blogspot to WordPress.com to self-hosted with one company then to another host. The number of different scenarios is what can lead to confusion: Moving from WordPress.com to WordPress.org (self-hosted); from [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving your blog (or CMS website) can often be a pain. Believe me, I know. Over the years, I have moved my personal blog from Blogspot to WordPress.com to self-hosted with one company then to another host.</p><p>The number of different scenarios is what can lead to confusion: Moving from WordPress.com to WordPress.org (self-hosted); from one hosting company to another; perhaps to a different location on the same host; from one domain to another.</p><p>You may be asking yourself <em>can WordPress be moved with zero down-time? Will I need to reinstall themes and/or plugins? Will visitors find my new WordPress site? Is the move a good time to upgrade WordPress to the latest version?<br
/> </em></p><p>There is excellent documentation available from many sources to guide you through the moving process and answer your questions. The WordPress codex on <a
href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress" target="_self">moving WordPress</a> is the first port of call. It is also advisable to <a
href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress#Additional_Information">consult the tutorials listed</a> at the foot of that guide. [I have listed some more references at the foot of this post]</p><p>However, if you feel some of the technicalities are beyond your grasp or you simply couldn&#8217;t be bothered learning new skills Glic I.T. can help. The cost will be in the range of €30-€70 depending on the complexity of the move and what additional functionality you wish to add to your site during it.</p><p><a
href="http://www.glicit.com/contact/">Contact us</a> for a quote.</p><p>Additional references: (Note: While all the below have the same, or similar, end result, each author has approached the process slightly differently)</p><ul><li><a
href="http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2010/04/03/moving-your-wordpress-site-and-database/">Weblogs Tools Collection</a></li><li><a
href="http://ocaoimh.ie/how-i-move-a-wordpress-blog-to-a-new-host/">Donncha O&#8217;Caoimh</a></li><li><a
href="http://yoast.com/move-wordpress-blog-domain-10-steps/">Joost de Valk</a></li></ul> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.glicit.com/2010/04/moving-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Kildare Animal Foundation website relaunched</title><link>http://www.glicit.com/2009/10/kildare-animal-foundation-website-relaunched/</link> <comments>http://www.glicit.com/2009/10/kildare-animal-foundation-website-relaunched/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:32:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[WordPress CMS]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.glicit.com/?p=552</guid> <description><![CDATA[Congratulations to the Kildare Animal Foundation on the relaunch of their website. While I built the framework and the base design, the hard work was done by Dan and Elise. After only a two hour training session with myself (and a few follow up emails) they managed to master the job. The site is built [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to the <a
href="http://animalfoundation.ie/" target="_blank">Kildare Animal Foundation</a> on the relaunch of their website.</p><p>While I built the framework and the base design, the hard work was done by Dan and Elise. After only a two hour training session with myself (and a few follow up emails) they managed to master the job.</p><p>The site is built on WordPress with some carefully selected plugins to enhance functionality and some tweaking of the theme to render a viable content management system (CMS).</p><p>Down the line I will be helping Dan and Elise roll out the ability for supporters of the foundation to make donations and to purchase goods from their shop online.</p><p>Pop by and visit. You never know &#8211; you may just see <a
href="http://animalfoundation.ie/we-need-a-home/" target="_blank">a dog or cat in need of rehoming </a>and fall in love.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.glicit.com/2009/10/kildare-animal-foundation-website-relaunched/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>WordPress 2.7 &#8211; The one problem it caused me</title><link>http://www.glicit.com/2008/12/wordpress-27-the-one-problem-it-caused-me/</link> <comments>http://www.glicit.com/2008/12/wordpress-27-the-one-problem-it-caused-me/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:44:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Training]]></category> <category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.glicit.com/?p=448</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have been using WordPress since version 2.0 (release on New Year&#8217;s Eve, 2005). Just today was I given a glimpse of what went before thanks to an excellent article over on planetozh. Of all the releases I&#8217;ve been through and the ones before my time on WordPress, 2.7 (released just days ago) has to [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using WordPress since version 2.0 (release on New Year&#8217;s Eve, 2005). Just today was I given a glimpse of what went before thanks to an excellent article over on <a
href="http://planetozh.com/blog/2008/12/a-journey-through-five-years-of-wordpress-interface/" target="_blank">planetozh</a>.</p><p>Of all the releases I&#8217;ve been through and the ones before my time on WordPress, 2.7 (released just days ago) has to be the most ground-breaking.</p><p>While there were many changes to the user interface in 2.5 (which caused a hue and cry in some quarters), 2.7 is totally different. Simple as that! It looks nothing like its predecessors.</p><p>The folks over at Automattic did a great job of keeping the user community in the loop during its development. They <a
href="http://wordpress.org/development/2008/11/the-results-of-project-icon/" target="_blank">asked us</a> which prototype designs we liked best; published <a
href="http://wordpress.org/development/2008/10/the-visual-design-of-27/" target="_blank">screen shots</a>; wrote user guides and created <a
href="http://wordpress.org/development/2008/12/coltrane/" target="_blank">video tutorials</a>.</p><p>A beta version was running on this site long before the official release. (I am a guinea pig). This gave me plenty of time to relearn and to discover the quirks and nuances. When the final 2.7 came out I hit the ground running. However, it did cause me one major problem:</p><p>A client&#8217;s site had just been rolled out on WordPress 2.6.5. I knew, for a number of reasons*, I would have to upgrade it to 2.7 when it became available. This was fine and the client would never even notice. All part of the service!</p><p>But his staff needed to be trained and he was pushing me to get it done. With prior releases this would not have been an issue, however the whole layout, and in some case terminology, altered with 2.7 and I would have had to retrain his people. So I had to ask him to hold off.</p><p>A week was lost on the project but it was worth it in the end. For the staff, normally limited to using email, word processors and spreadsheets only, moving to 2.7 from 2.6 would have been effectively learning a whole new system.</p><p>*Mainly as maintaining a single version is easier for myself, but also to be able to avail of the latest security patches.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.glicit.com/2008/12/wordpress-27-the-one-problem-it-caused-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Carrington Blog</title><link>http://www.glicit.com/2008/11/the-carrington-blog/</link> <comments>http://www.glicit.com/2008/11/the-carrington-blog/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[WordPress CMS]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.glicit.com/?p=435</guid> <description><![CDATA[It is somewhat unfortunate that the titles Carrington Blog and Carrington Theme are used, for it is neither &#8211; Carrignton is a framework on which to develop blog themes for WordPress. Using the terms blog and theme has led many to believe it can be downloaded and used to dress up a blog straight from [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is somewhat unfortunate that the titles <a
href="http://carringtontheme.com/" target="_blank">Carrington Blog</a> and <a
href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/carrington-blog" target="_blank">Carrington Theme</a> are used, for it is neither &#8211; Carrignton is a framework on which to develop blog themes for WordPress.</p><p>Using the terms <em>blog</em> and <em>theme</em> has led many to believe it can be downloaded and used to dress up a blog straight from the tin. This is true &#8211; it can be if that&#8217;s all you want is the <em>vanilla</em> framework.</p><p>But the early adopters tend to be those who will find the bugs and try to fix them, or will want to <em>customise</em> by stripping out or adding in a line of code here and there.</p><p>Carrington is not like any other existing theme and attempts to tweak it as if it were will usually result in frustration or fail totally without an understanding of how it works. <a
href="http://alexking.org/" target="_blank">Alex King</a> has been at pains to explain to those who complain it is not user-friendly that &#8220;Carrington is a theme framework; it is designed for developers&#8221;. [Source: <a
href="http://crowdfavorite.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=1727" target="_blank">Crowd Favourite Forums</a>]. He must be blue in the face doing so &#8211; then he does live in Denver and it&#8217;s damn cold there.</p><p>That said, many must be happy with it. In little over a month since it was made available on WordPress.org there have been 14,000+ downloads. I am one of those happy people. In fact I&#8217;m more than happy. And I&#8217;m excited about what the next releases will bring.</p><p>Carrington takes the abstraction of WordPress tags to a new level.</p><p>Those who are familiar with WordPress conditional tags will be used to doing things such as adding code to the header.php file do make it act differently if what&#8217;s is being loaded is, for example, if it&#8217;s an archive page do something; do something else if it is a category page; and so on.</p><p>Depending on the complexity of what one is trying to be achieve (and the quality, good or bad, of the algorithm employed) this can result in a lot of code.</p><p>In Carrington this is done by creating separate archive.php, category.php and so on, files within the header directory. The process is as simple as copying the default-header.php and tweaking as needed.</p><p>Carrington automatically detects what is being loaded: If it is an archive it uses the archive.php file. If there isn&#8217;t one, it loads the default-header.php.</p><p>Novices to Carrington may think this a lot of work, that it leads to multiple files and the same amount of coding, it doesn&#8217;t and in cases where it does, it can be a good thing:</p><p>I find it leads to much less coding. Copy the default and add, delete or edit a line to do something. No need for conditional statements &#8211; Carrington takes care of that.</p><p>Usually all that is needed is to make one or two new files. It is unlikely one would want to have different actions for all page and post types.</p><p>Multiple files can help the developer modularise their work, much like OO programmers do. In addition, when an update to the framework is released from Crowd Favourite only the defaults will be overwritten at install &#8211; all the special coding the developer has done will be unaffected. Unless the default itself has been altered, which in a framework shouldn&#8217;t actually happen.</p><p>I am certain Carrington can be made do far more than Crowd Favourite say in the documentation or on their website. I&#8217;ll let you know how I get on with my experiments. (Hey, com&#8217;on &#8211; who hasn&#8217;t played with the bits in the <em>Do not change the code above this line</em> part?)</p><p>I predict Carrington will lead to the rollout of many more frameworks. That they become the standard system for delivering WordPress themes is likely too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.glicit.com/2008/11/the-carrington-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/15 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk

Served from: www.glicit.com @ 2010-09-05 22:29:09 -->